<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White Hat vs Black Hat Social Media Optimization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seodilip4u.wordpress.com/2008/10/22/white-hat-vs-black-hat-social-media-optimization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seodilip4u.wordpress.com/2008/10/22/white-hat-vs-black-hat-social-media-optimization/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:12:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Igor Varyvoda</title>
		<link>http://seodilip4u.wordpress.com/2008/10/22/white-hat-vs-black-hat-social-media-optimization/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor Varyvoda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seodilip4u.wordpress.com/?p=121#comment-63</guid>
		<description>OK, so the consequences of White and Black hat SEO are probably the same really. A black hat is ready for penalties, most of the process is automized etc. It&#039;s really about fooling the search engine, not the consumer etc. So, yeah, you&#039;re a little biased. Though I agree that a significant amount of Black Hats fraud. And this part is pretty common: &quot;The ironic thing is that it’s black hat SEO’s themselves…that have convinced me black hat SEO isn’t worth the effort&quot; the less competitors you have in the Black Hat SEO, the better. The more time it will take google and SM services to discover the techniques and thus, the more effective the result. Thabks for the post anyway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so the consequences of White and Black hat SEO are probably the same really. A black hat is ready for penalties, most of the process is automized etc. It&#8217;s really about fooling the search engine, not the consumer etc. So, yeah, you&#8217;re a little biased. Though I agree that a significant amount of Black Hats fraud. And this part is pretty common: &#8220;The ironic thing is that it’s black hat SEO’s themselves…that have convinced me black hat SEO isn’t worth the effort&#8221; the less competitors you have in the Black Hat SEO, the better. The more time it will take google and SM services to discover the techniques and thus, the more effective the result. Thabks for the post anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
